Congress Has a Plan to Defend Your First Amendment Rights After Court’s Marriage Ruling

Commentary By

Mike Lee is a Republican senator from Utah.
The Daily Signal

In the wake of Friday’s 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court in the marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges, many of the millions of Americans who voted to define marriage as an exclusively male-female institution in their state constitutions will be wondering: What does this mean for me?

Congress must move swiftly to pass the First Amendment Defense Act.

If five judges on the Supreme Court have pronounced, in a breathtaking presumption of power, that all 50 states must redefine marriage, what does that mean for the countless institutions within our civil society—churches and synagogues, charities and adoption agencies, counseling services and religiously affiliated schools—that are made up of American citizens who believe marriage is the union of one man and one woman?

Will federal government agencies follow the heavy-handed approach taken by the present majority of Supreme Court justices—say, by revoking the non-profit, tax-exempt status of faith-based schools that continue to operate on the basis of their religious beliefs about marriage?

Nowhere in the majority’s 28-page opinion will you find a reliable answer to these questions. In his dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts explains why.

“Federal courts are blunt instruments when it comes to creating rights,” Roberts writes, because “they do not have the flexibility of legislatures to address concerns of parties not before the court or to anticipate problems that may arise from the exercise of a new right.”

It’s true that Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, acknowledges—as if in passing—that “The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths,” including their conviction that marriage is the union between one man and one woman.

But this may prove to be little consolation for those who have conscientious objections to the redefinition of marriage. For the remainder of Kennedy’s opinion, like much of today’s jurisprudence, is based on the pretension that the role of judges is not merely to resolve cases and controversies in the law, but to apply their own “reasoned judgment” to define for each successive generation the “nature of injustice” and divine the “meaning” of liberty.

That’s why I recently introduced a bill, with Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, in the House, called the First Amendment Defense Act that would prevent any agency from denying a federal tax exemption, grant, contract, accreditation, license, or certification to an individual or institution for acting on their religious belief that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.

In light of the Supreme Court decision, Congress must move swiftly to pass the First Amendment Defense Act and clarify in federal law what five justices left ambiguous in their legal opinion: that the right to form and to follow one’s religious beliefs is the bedrock of human dignity and liberty that must be forcefully defended from government interference.

H	B	T	N	S	B	C
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30

	Trần Đình Hoành trong Tủ sách Kim Định
	Mai Trung Hiếu trong Tủ sách Kim Định
	Đào Thu Hằng trong ‘Thước đo đô thị’…
	Đào Thu Hằng trong Xe buýt miễn phí, cần thêm giả…
	Đào Thu Hằng trong Những gánh hàng rong cuối cùng…
	Trần Đình Hoành trong Do the Chinese who visit Vietn…
	Trần Đình Hoành trong My friend said that Japan, Kor…
	Đào Thu Hằng trong Why did Vietnam hate Chin…
	Trương Hiếu trong Người già Việt Nam giữa khoảng…
	Trần Đình Hoành trong Khởi tố, bắt bị can để tạm gia…
	Trần Đình Hoành trong Thủ tướng: Những viên gạch đầu…
	Trần Đình Hoành trong Is it easy to invade Vietnam…
	Phạm Thu Hương trong Lãnh đạo xin lỗi dân vùng…
	Đào Thu Hằng trong 379 TỔ CHỨC PHI CHÍNH PHỦ NƯỚC…
	Phạm Thu Hương trong Công lý cho dân vùng lũ

Congress Has a Plan to Defend Your First Amendment Rights After Court’s Marriage Ruling

Đăng bởi Trần Đình Hoành

Trả lời Hủy trả lời

Chia sẻ:

Liên quan

Đăng bởi Trần Đình Hoành

Trả lời Hủy trả lời