I am an attorney in the Washington DC area, with a Doctor of Law in the US, attended the master program at the National School of Administration of Việt Nam, and graduated from Sài Gòn University Law School. I aso studied philosophy at the School of Letters in Sài Gòn.
.
I have worked as an anti-trust attorney for Federal Trade Commission and a litigator for a fortune-100 telecom company in Washington DC.
I have taught law courses for legal professionals in Việt Nam and still counsel VN government agencies on legal matters.
I have founded and managed businesses for me and my family, both law and non-law.
I have published many articles on national newspapers and radio stations in Việt Nam.
In 1989 I was one of the founding members of US-VN Trade Council, working to re-establish US-VN relationship.
Since the early 90's, I have established and managed VNFORUM and VNBIZ forum on VN-related matters; these forums are the subject of a PhD thesis by Dr. Caroline Valverde at UC-Berkeley and her book Transnationalizing Viet Nam.
I translate poetry and my translation of "A Request at Đồng Lộc Cemetery" is now engraved on a stone memorial at Đồng Lộc National Shrine in VN.
I study and teach the Bible and Buddhism. In 2009 I founded and still manage dotchuoinon.com on positive thinking and two other blogs on Buddhism.
In 2015 a group of friends and I founded website CVD - Conversations on Vietnam Development (cvdvn.net).
I study the art of leadership with many friends who are religious, business and government leaders from many countries.
I have written these books, published by Phu Nu Publishing House in Hanoi:
"Positive Thinking to Change Your Life", in Vietnamese (TƯ DUY TÍCH CỰC Thay Đổi Cuộc Sống) (Oct. 2011)
"10 Core Values for Success" (10 Giá trị cốt lõi của thành công) (Dec. 2013)
"Live a Life Worth Living" (Sống Một Cuộc Đời Đáng Sống) (Oct. 2023)
I practice Jiu Jitsu and Tai Chi for health, and play guitar as a hobby, usually accompanying my wife Trần Lê Túy Phượng, aka singer Linh Phượng.
No American or Allied POWs escaped from North Vietnamese territory 1964 to 1973. Some Allied personnel were able to escape from NLF Viet Cong captivity in South Vietnam from 1963 to 1972. Same with Laos and Cambodia, some personnel escaped from Pathet Lao or Khemer Rouge captivity
[TĐH; Very funny. All those simple hand-made booby traps and tunnels and even killing village leaders who cooperated with the South VN government or the US (which I don’t approve at all, and I call that Terrorism, to terrorize the Southern population) is no where near the US’ and South Vietnam government’s bombings, including B-52 “carpet bombing” to clean any path they flied by (if you heard the sound of B52, your were going to die; no way to run); Napalm bombings – burning you and everyone and the forests and everything ínsight; Agent Orange killing all the trees and left hundreds of thousands of people sick until today – third and fourth generations after the war. Saying the Vietnamese were brutal is like telling a six-year-old kid who punches the belly of a thirty-year-old man that the kid is brutal. Come on, you guys and gals, have some common sense. For God’s sake.]
The VC butchered their own people, making examples of village leaders who cooperated with the South Vietnamese government or the United States. Those are facts.
The VC constructed illegal booby traps, such as punji stick pits, bouncing bettys, cartridge tripwire traps, grenade tripwire traps, snake pits, the mace (photo), tiger traps, bamboo whips, and pressure release traps.
These traps were just as likely to kill or maim civilians as they were members of the ARVN or US military, as they were normally put on trails and near riverbanks.
[TDH : Trump the Idiot. Try to attack Vietnam or any coutry defending their home against foregn aggression war like Iran or Cuba – and you shall learn, be it military or economic or 1000% tariffs. You idiotic Joker are the shame for the US, where I am practicing law as a US citizen in Washingont DC. You shame me and millions of US citizens]
Defending Democracy Shawna Topanga SF State & ID State Univs, AS & BBS, Life & work experience Apr 22
George Wallace’s 1968 Presidential campaign featured Air Force General Curtis Lemay as the Vice Presidential nominee. Well Bombs Away Lemay also had an idea of how to end the Vietnam War quickly too: nukes. And, had he gotten any more traction than he did, there would have been lots of mushroom clouds over Vietnam … instead of having mushrooms in your dimsun soup in Hanoi.
My parents are heavily influenced by Northern values and ideals of Northern people. I was born in the South yet have many friends from the North. I have Northern accents yet I live a stricter-than-average Southern lifestyle. I consider myself to be a blended type. I have a couple things to add: Tiếp tục đọc “Do North Vietnamese feel superior to South Vietnamese?”→
Paul Denlinger · Have worked in several China internet startups4y
Both are run by Communist parties;
Simply because the names of the ruling parties include the word “Communist” does not mean that they are strictly communist;
Both Vietnam and China understand that they are more powerful and influential domestically and internationally if their people are prosperous instead of poor;
You don’t understand the difference between the words “Communist” and “communist”, and think labels are really important. For this reason, your question shows that you suffer from outdated stereotypes which no longer have meaning in the real world. This is a common problem, especially among Americans.
There is a chapter about Cu Chi Tunnel in this book : Bare Feet, Iron Will Stories from the Other Side of Vietnam’s Battlefield. by James G. Zumwalt.
He came to Vietnam after the war, against Vietnamese but latterly changed his view a little bit. It is worth reading, easy to read from US perspective if you want to research about life in tunnels.
Below are introduction about background and the author via publisher in Amazon.
I remember a report reads that a fund manager said, “In geopolitics, everyone talks about risk, but money only cares about who can price it.” Watching the signals coming out of the China Development Forum 2026, that line suddenly feels less like a joke and more like a framework.
Held at Diaoyutai State Guesthouse just after China’s Two Sessions, the forum carried an unusually coherent message: in a world where geopolitical tensions, supply chain fragmentation, and protectionism are all intensifying, China is positioning itself not as the loudest player, but as the most predictable one. That distinction matters more than it sounds. In Washington’s policy language, uncertainty is often weaponized, through tariffs, export controls, and strategic ambiguity. In Beijing’s language, uncertainty is treated as something to be absorbed, managed, and reduced.
Some may refer to the kingdom of Xích Quỷ (2879–2524 BCE) established by King Kinh Dương, in which written records described it of this size:
Unfortunately, this is legendary, and not real. There is no evidence of Xích Quỷ’s existence or being this big. At most, the records written centuries later were referring to the Baiyue tribes as a whole. In reality, those tribes never formed a united nation.
Some may refer to the kingdom of Văn Lang (7th cent.–258 BCE) established by Lạc Long Quân, in which written records described it of this size:
Unfortunately, this is also legendary, and not real, with the same basis as Xích Quỷ’s. However, it was plausible that the kingdom of Văn Lang was real, just not this big, and was ruled by the Lạc Việt, of whom China and Vietnam have differing opinions on its location. According to official Vietnamese history, this was its actual size:
In short answer, during the Sino-Vietnamese War, after suffering a large number of casualties and before the coming of the Vietnamese crack troops, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (P.L.A) had to withdraw their forces. The “road to Hanoi lay open and the city could have fallen to China” was also a war myth. In fact, all the roads from the border regions to Hanoi were heavily fortified and garrisoned by several main force divisions of the People’s Army of Vietnam (P.A.V.N).
The Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces commonly wore rubber sandals (often called “Ho Chi Minh sandals” or dép lốp) for practical, tactical, economic, and cultural reasons. Key factors:
Cost and availability
Made from recycled car or truck tire soles, these sandals were extremely cheap to produce and easy to repair or replace in the field.
Local cobblers could cut and strap soles quickly using scrap materials, enabling mass distribution without industrial supply lines.
Durability and suitability for terrain
Thick tire rubber resisted sharp stones, thorns, and rough trails better than many civilian shoes.
Here’s something that doesn’t happen every day. Just one week after being elected Vietnam’s president, To Lam flew to Beijing for a state visit. Oh, and by the way—he’s also the Communist Party chief. This is his *second* time making China his first overseas trip after taking a new top job. The first was in August 2024, within 10 days of becoming party general secretary.
Life in South Vietnam after the Communist takeover in 1975 was marked by political oppression, property confiscation, economic hardship, and deep social upheaval.
There was a popular saying at the time: “If a lamp post could walk, it would flee the country too.”
I was in New York a few years ago when a senior executive from a Chinese state-owned enterprise (SOE) said something that stuck with me: “Going global is easy. Staying global is hard.” At the time, it sounded like a cliché. Today, it reads more like a policy diagnosis.
On April 8, China quietly made a move that many outside observers may underestimate: the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council established a dedicated bureau for overseas state-owned assets. On paper, it looks administrative. In reality, it signals a structural upgrade in how China thinks about globalization, not expansion first, governance second, but both simultaneously.
The North Vietnamese ( NVA) forces suffered huge losses in men and materiel. The bulk of the ground fighting was carried by the South Vietnamese Army (ARVN) who defended their country ferociously. They still do not receive adequate credit and recognition.