‘Three-parent baby’ claim raises hopes — and ethical concerns

Questions surround report of baby created using controversial mitochondrial replacement technique.

28 September 2016 Article tools Rights & Permissions

Courtesy of New Hope Fertility Center

Team leader John Zhang and the ‘three-parent’ baby have made headlines across the world.

Nature – A reported world-first in fertility therapy — a baby boy conceived with a controversial technique that mixes DNA from three people – has made headlines across the world. But with no way of verifying the claim because the specialists behind the procedure aren’t releasing data until October, some researchers are questioning the ethics of the procedure. In particular, they ask why the US-based team behind the operation chose to carry it out in Mexico, a country with less-clear oversight of human embryo modification than, for instance, the United Kingdom or the United States.

Researchers at the New Hope Fertility Center in New York City told New Scientist — which broke the news on 27 September — that they had conducted the procedure for a Jordanian couple, and that the baby boy was born in April. The team, led by John Zhang, is not due to present details until 19 October, at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah, but it has published an abstract online with sparse information.

According to the abstract, the boy’s mother has a rare disease called Leigh’s syndrome, a neurological disorder caused by faulty mitochondria, the cell’s energy-producing structures. The couple lost two children to the disease before asking the clinic’s help.

Spindle transfer

In an attempt to create embryos without the mother’s faulty mitochondria, the clinic’s team transferred the nucleus of the mother’s egg cell to the egg of a donor with healthy mitochondria — a technique known as spindle transfer — and then fertilized it with the father’s sperm, the team reports in the abstract. Zhang’s team modified five embryos, one of which was implanted into the mother and survived to birth. That baby inherited nuclear DNA from both parents and mitochrondrial DNA from the donor.

Although other ‘three-parent’ babies were born in the 1990s, they were created using a different technique in which mitochondria and other cellular material from the eggs of healthy donors were transferred into the eggs of the mothers, which were then fertilized with the fathers’ sperm.

So the Zhang team’s achievement, if verified, would represent the first child conceived using the spindle-transfer version of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT). In the United States, MRT is in principle allowed, but requires review and approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Last year, Congress banned the FDA from using federal funds to review proposals that would manipulate the genetics of human embryos — hamstringing the agency. Lawmakers appear poised to continue the funding ban into the 2017 fiscal year. The United Kingdom, meanwhile, decided last year to allow MRT under license.

“We’d love to do it with partners around the world, and reach out to more families that might need help,” Zhang told Nature. He says his group plans to monitor the baby to ensure that the technique was safe and effective.

Unresolved issues?

Embryologist Jacques Cohen, who carried out the 1990s procedures and is now laboratory director of the biotech company Reprogenetics in Livingston, New Jersey, was a regulatory adviser on Zhang’s study and welcomes the news that the spindle method seems to be effective. “I think the world is ready to try this out. It has been discussed for a long time,” he says. “I think there are risks, but that’s what happens when you do experimental procedure for the first time.”

Cohen’s clinic produced 17 babies before the US began regulating MRT in 2002. He has recently followed up with 13 of the children from his study — now teenagers — and is about to publish an article about their outcomes. Although he declines to give details, Cohen says they have no obvious health problems.

But some other researchers are troubled by Zhang’s announcement. “They just went ahead and did it,” says David Clancy, who studies mitochondrial biology at Lancaster University, UK. “The number of issues that are still unresolved — it’s just staggering.”

Among the unknowns is the possibility that the technique could transfer some diseased mitochondria from the mother into the donor egg along with the nucleus. According to Zhang’s abstract, 5% of the embryo’s mitochondrial DNA was carried over along with the mother’s nucleus — while mitochondrial DNA samples taken from the baby after birth varied from tissue to tissue and suggested a level of faulty DNA that was at most 1.6%.

Cohen says that it is generally believed that no symptoms will occur if fewer than about 20% of mitochondrial DNA are faulty . But Dietrich Egli, a stem-cell scientist at the New York Stem Cell Foundation who is developing mitochondrial transfer techniques, says that 5% at the embyro stage is 10 times higher than that seen in studies using spindle transfer on embryos not destined for implantation. As a result, he says the technique “was not carried out well”. “It is a remarkable step but unfortunately it is not well done,” he adds.

Clancy notes that it is impossible to analyse mitochondria in a live human from organs such as the heart and brain and that weak mitochondria would be particularly problematic in these organs.

Why Mexico?

More concerning to some researchers is the fact that Zhang’s procedure was performed in Mexico. Zhang told New Scientist that “there are no rules” in Mexico. Legal scholar Rosario Isasi at the University of Miami in Florida says that there are laws governing the manipulation of human genes –but she adds that they are badly worded and that there are exemptions that seem to be made for manipulations intended to cure deadly disease.

Isasi questions the wisdom of performing the procedure in Mexico, which has a reputation as attracting patients from elsewhere who seek unproven cures that are not allowed in their own countries, instead of a country such as Sweden, whose government closely regulates the clinical use of therapies. “You have all these negatives, and it’s not a place that can offer the scientists a high-tech environment,” says Isasi.

The clinic chose Mexico because it already had a branch there, New Hope spokesman Geoffrey Hawes told Nature. He declined to comment on whether the regulatory environment in Mexico played a part in the decision. “It’s off limits, we won’t comment on regulations,” he says.

Chinese experiment

It is not the first time that Zhang had attempted MRT through spindle technology. In August, hepublished a paper reporting on a 2003 experiment that his team carried out in China. The team implanted three human embryos produced through spindle technology into a woman who had failed to conceive children. All of the embryos miscarried.

In a statement sent to Nature, reproductive biologist Shoukhrat Mitalipov at the Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, who pioneered spindle transfer in primates and is currently seeking approval to perform human trials, said that the strict US regulations are forcing researchers to move trials into other countries.“We believe it’s time to move forward with FDA-approved clinical trials in the United States,” he says.

Egli is worried that any poorly done research in this area could hurt the chances of other groups as governments debate whether to allow the techniques. “I think this kind of new technique needs a very serious approach and careful planning,” he says.

Isasi points out that Zhang’s group did seem to follow ethical guidelines put forward by professional societies such as the US National Academy of Science. The embryo that they transferred is a male and many guidelines specify that only male embryos should be brought to term: because children receive mitochondria only from their mothers, there is no risk of a male passing the donated mitochondria on to his offspring.


One thought on “‘Three-parent baby’ claim raises hopes — and ethical concerns

  1. Với công nghệ sinh học thì gần như không có gì là không thể. Chuyện một em bé ra đời với 3 bố mẹ này cũng vậy, là chuyện có thể làm được với công nghệ sinh học. Kỹ thuật này đã nghiên cứu từ khá lâu và theo thời gian, kỹ thuật này tất yếu sẽ dần hoàn thiện.

    Nhưng đây không phải là vấn đề kỹ thuật. Cũng không phải là vấn đề ước mơ của một số gia đình hiếm muộn. Mà là vấn đề đạo đức và tâm linh của toàn nhân loại.

    Về mặt đạo đức, kỹ thuật này có thể dùng để chọn lọc giới tính thai nhi, dẫn đến mất cân bằng giới tính và làm nghiêm trọng thêm tình trạng bất bình đẳng giới tính.

    Về mặt tâm linh, có lẽ con người nên hiểu: Một em bé ra đời là một ân sủng từ Thượng đế. (Nói theo kiểu người Việt: “Con cái là Trời cho.”). Sự can thiệp quá đáng của kỹ thuật sinh học vào chuyện tạo em bé có lẽ làm cái tôi của con người càng lúc càng to.

    “Tôi muốn có con của tôi (không phải con nuôi hay con của người khác”, “Tôi muốn được làm bố, làm mẹ (dù tôi khó/ không có khả năng – vì Trời không cho).”… “Cái tôi” hiện lên khá rõ trong những câu này. “Cái tôi” càng lớn, con người càng xa dần Thượng đế.

    Các bố mẹ tương lai à, một em bé tất nhiên là niềm vui của gia đình. Nhưng vì hạnh phúc của chính mình mà góp tay đẩy nhân loại vào con đường xa rời với Thượng đế thì có nên không?

    Có cầu thì có cung. Có khát khao có em bé thì có các kỹ thuật và nhà khoa học xuất hiện để đáp ứng nhu cầu đó.

    Có lẽ chúng ta nên vui vẻ với tất cả những gì Trời cho chúng ta. Nhiêu đó cũng đủ vui rồi.

    Liked by 2 people

Trả lời

Mời bạn điền thông tin vào ô dưới đây hoặc kích vào một biểu tượng để đăng nhập:

WordPress.com Logo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản WordPress.com Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Google photo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Google Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Twitter picture

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Twitter Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Facebook photo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Facebook Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: