Hong Kong to be governed by mysterious law secretly passed by China



China’s new national security legislation for Hong Kong was written and passed behind closed doors, without the consultation of the city’s local government or legislature.
It reportedly came into force on June 30, potentially rewriting the city’s legal system – despite the fact the overwhelming majority of residents have no idea of what precisely it will entail.
According to reports in Communist Party-controlled media, the law is expected to criminalise offenses such as secession, subversion against the central Chinese government, terrorism, and colluding with foreign forces.
Riot police stop and search people during a protest against the national security law.
Riot police stop and search people during a protest against the national security law. (Getty)
But hours after its reported passage, details remain vague, capping a particularly opaque process that has left analysts and activists guessing.
Speaking at a weekly press conference this morning, the city’s leader Carrie Lam initially refused to answer questions about the law, saying it was “inappropriate for me to comment.”

Hours later she defended it in a video speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, saying it will restore stability and prosperity to Hong Kong.
Her administration appears to have been cut almost completely out of the process – yet it has not stopped them predicting the law will only impact a tiny minority of individuals in the city, and won’t harm political freedoms and judicial autonomy.
Hong Kong locals have been agitating for greater freedoms, as China seeks to tighten its hold on the territory.
Hong Kong locals have been agitating for greater freedoms, as China seeks to tighten its hold on the territory. (Getty)
In a statement last week, Lam said the legislation would be “in line with the rule of law” and the “rights and freedoms which are applicable in Hong Kong.”
Some aren’t taking any chances, however.
Multiple opposition political parties had already disbanded by this afternoon, with members fearing prosecution under the new offenses of subversion or secession, which are applied broadly in China to crush anti-government dissent.
Riot police stand guard outside of a shop during a protest against the national security law.
Riot police stand guard outside of a shop during a protest against the national security law. (Getty)

Chilling effect of mysterious new law

Prominent activist Joshua Wong announced soon after the bill’s reported passage that he was leaving Demosisto, the political party he co-founded in 2016, but would continue to campaign independently.
Other leading figures in the party, including former lawmaker Nathan Law and activist Agnes Chow, soon followed suit, and what was left of the party leadership eventually decided to cease operations.
Chow was barred from standing for election in 2018 over her membership in Demosisto, which had previously called for Hong Kongers to be allowed to decide their own future, including voting on a potential break from China.
Beijing has passed the controversial national security law which will threaten Hong Kong’s autonomy and political freedoms. (Photo by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images) (Getty)
Such talk could be illegal under the new law, if it follows the model of similar legislation in China as expected.
Wong, Law and Chow have also been heavily involved in lobbying the international community to pressure Beijing over Hong Kong, which many expect to be classed as “colluding with foreign forces.”
Two other political parties, the Hong Kong National Front and Studentlocalism, also said they were ceasing operations in the city, though both groups – fringe pro-independence parties – said they would continue to work overseas.
Some pro-independence figures are known to have fled Hong Kong in recent months, fearing arrest in connection with last year’s often violent anti-government protests, or the upcoming law.
Pro-democracy supporters hold a Hong Kong Independence flag and shout slogans during a rally against the national security law as riot police secure an area in a shopping mall. (Photo by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images) (Getty)
On Sunday, Wayne Chan, convenor of the Hong Kong Independence Union, confirmed he had jumped bail and left the city. He had been facing protest-related charges.
“After the national security law is passed, we can anticipate that a large group of political figures will be arrested, and may be imprisoned immediately without bail,” Chan wrote on Facebook.
More subtle signs of a chilling effect were also in evidence today, as shops and businesses which had previously been highly visible supporters of the city’s protest movement began removing slogans and imagery that could be deemed illegal.
Riot police setup cordon during a protest against the national security law. (Photo by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images) (Getty)

Hong Kong in legal limbo

While pro-government groups and politicians welcomed the passage of the law – former leader C.Y. Leung offered bounties for future prosecutions – there was great frustration among many Hong Kongers over the continued lack of detail, and a feeling of almost being in limbo, knowing the law has been passed but not what that means.
In a letter to the city’s government yesterday, Hong Kong Bar Association chairman Philip Dykes said the secrecy of the law was “genuinely extraordinary” and called on the government to make clear how citizens’ minimum rights will be guaranteed.
The Global Times, a nationalist Chinese state-backed tabloid, said the law was already having its effect, pointing to the resignation of Wong and others.
Pro-democracy supporters make a gesture as they sing a song during a memorial service in a church. (Photo by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images) (Getty)
Stanley Ng, a Hong Kong delegate to China’s National People’s Congress, appeared to endorse this view, saying in a Facebook video that part of the reason for the secrecy around the law was to enable “intimidation and deterrence.”
Such uncertainty will likely persist beyond today, when the bill is finally expected to be made public and gazetted.
Regardless of how the offences are described or the punishments laid down, many will be watching to see how strenuously police and prosecutors enforce them.
A key test will come tomorrow, when Hong Kong marks the 23rd anniversary of the city’s handover to Chinese rule. The day has traditionally seen an anti-government march through the city, but the protest has been banned this year.
Organisers say they will go ahead anyway. Yet how many people join them, and what offences – if any – those people are deemed to be committing if they do, remains to be seen.

Chinese apps banned in India

Meanwhile, India has banned social media giant TikTok, as part of a sweeping shutdown of Chinese apps in the country.
TikTok, WeChat, UC Browser and Shein are among 59 Chinese apps banned in India in response to serious concerns about data security.
Riyaz Afreen, Nisha Guragain and Mr Faisu are among India's most popular stars on TikTok, with tens of millions of followers.
Riyaz Afreen, Nisha Guragain and Mr Faisu are among India’s most popular stars on TikTok, with tens of millions of followers. (TikTok)
“The Ministry of Information Technology has received many complaints from various sources including several reports about misuse of some mobile apps available on Android and iOS platforms for stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users’ data in an unauthorised manner to servers which have locations outside India,” the Indian government said in a statement.
“The compilation of these data, its mining and profiling by elements hostile to national security and defence of India, which ultimately impinges upon the sovereignty and integrity of India, is a matter of very deep and immediate concern which requires emergency measures.”
The ban comes after a border clash left at least 20 Indian soldiers dead.
Both India and China said the other country had intruded on their territory in the Himalayas.
Troops have building up on both sides of the India-China border in the wake of the fighting.
“Unlike India’s border with Pakistan, It’s not very well defined. So occasional clashes can easily occur, for instance when a soldier wanders too far and sets up camp on the other side,” Australian National University foreign affairs expert Clive Williams told Nine.com.au last week.
“You may have a local army commander who is a bit more aggressive than others. And then it is easier for tensions to rise.”

Trả lời

Điền thông tin vào ô dưới đây hoặc nhấn vào một biểu tượng để đăng nhập:

WordPress.com Logo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản WordPress.com Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Twitter picture

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Twitter Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Facebook photo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Facebook Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Connecting to %s