Al Jazeeza
Tác giả: Trần Đình Hoành
Tiếng Việt còn: Những thay đổi của tiếng Việt trong quá khứ
SBS tiếng Việt
Nghe audio clip: Tiếng Việt còn: Những thay đổi của tiếng Việt trong quá khứ (Nguyễn Cung Thông)
Some of the teachers who are studying the Masters of Teaching. They speak multiple languages including Mandarin, Arabic, Vietnamese, Armenian and Malayalam. Source: SBS News

Học giả Phạm Quỳnh nổi tiếng câu ‘Truyện Kiều còn, thì nước Việt còn’, nói rộng ra là “Tiếng Việt còn, thì nước Việt còn’ cũng mang ý nghĩa có lẽ cũng không khác.Qua thời gian tiếng Việt đã thay đổi từ thời có thể xem từ lúc có quyển tự điển Việt Bồ La hồi thế kỷ 18, tiếng Việt ngày càng phong phú và khởi sắc cũng như mang đặc thù dân tộc.
Tiếp tục đọc “Tiếng Việt còn: Những thay đổi của tiếng Việt trong quá khứ”
Congressional Research Service: U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress (Aug. 4, 2021)
Issuing Presidential Statement, Security Council Underlines Importance of Maritime Safety, Safeguarding Oceans for Legitimate Use
9 AUGUST 2021

Maritime security is being undermined at an alarming pace by challenges around contested boundaries, the depletion of natural resources and armed attacks — from piracy to terrorism — senior United Nations officials told the Security Council today, as world leaders adopted a presidential statement outlining their concerns over the increasing frequency of such events.
In a presidential statement (document S/PRST/2021/15) presented by the Prime Minister of India, Council President for August, the 15-member organ noted the problem of transnational organized crimes committed at sea — including illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, smuggling of migrants and illicit trafficking in firearms — as well as the “deplorable” loss of life and adverse impact on international trade stemming from such activities.
U.S., China trade barbs at U.N. over South China Sea


U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks to the media prior a meeting with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba at the State Department in Washington, DC, U.S. August 5, 2021. Saul Loeb/Pool via REUTERS
NEW YORK, Aug 9 (Reuters) – U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken called out bullying in the South China Sea on Monday and warned the U.N. Security Council that a conflict “would have serious global consequences for security and for commerce,” sparking a strong rebuke from China.
The South China Sea has become one of many flashpoints in the testy relationship between China and the United States, with Washington rejecting what it calls unlawful territorial claims by Beijing in the resource-rich waters.
Tiếp tục đọc “U.S., China trade barbs at U.N. over South China Sea”Các luận cứ hiến pháp và luật pháp liên quan đến vaccine

Chào các bạn,
Hiện nay đang có nhiều cuộc biểu tình tại nhiều quốc gia trên thế giới, đặc biệt là Châu Âu, chống vaccine Covid. Và mình nghĩ rằng trong tương lai, khi các chính phủ gia tăng yêu cầu vaccine, thì những biểu tình chống đối của những người không thích vaccine có thể tăng theo, cộng với nhiều vụ khởi kiện chống lại quyết định của chính phủ. Để giúp các bạn hiểu được những yếu tố pháp lý nằm bên dưới những hiện tượng xã hội lớn lao này, mình viết bài này để trình bày một vài yếu tố hiến pháp và luật pháp chính. Tiếp tục đọc “Các luận cứ hiến pháp và luật pháp liên quan đến vaccine”
Reconciling the Past for a Stronger Partnership: Shaping U.S.-Vietnam Relations under the Biden Administration
Lê Thu Hương, August 4, 2021 CSIS

As the first trip by a Biden administration cabinet official, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s visit to Southeast Asia last week held considerable symbolic significance. His speech in Singapore marked a clear distinction between the administration’s approach to the region and that of the Trump team. Austin delivered a message consistent with the U.S. intention to compete with China while tailoring the tone to reflect the concerns of Southeast Asians. In his remarks, Austin clarified that the United States will not force countries to “choose” between Washington and Beijing—addressing a strongly held, and unpopular, perception in the region based on the Trump administration’s sharp rhetoric.
Tiếp tục đọc “Reconciling the Past for a Stronger Partnership: Shaping U.S.-Vietnam Relations under the Biden Administration”Nguồn gốc đàn tranh Việt Nam

Đây là ấn bản tiếng Việt thứ năm của tiểu luận Nguồn Gốc Đàn Tranh Việt Nam. Nếu ấn bản thứ nhất (1987), thứ hai (1990) và thứ ba (1996) đặt tiền đề và cơ sở lý luận về nguồn gốc đàn tranh Việt dựa trên các yếu tố ngôn ngữ học và thiết kế nhạc khí thì ấn bản thứ tư (2020) và ấn bản này cung cấp nhiều tư liệu lịch sử và khảo cổ để làm rõ và cũng cố những giả thuyết và kết luận được nêu ra trong ba ấn bản trước đây. Mong rằng tiểu luận này sẽ giúp bạn đọc mở ra một cái nhìn mới về lịch sử đàn tranh Việt và nhạc Việt.
Người viết xin chân thành cảm ơn Gsts. Nguyễn Thuyết Phong đã gửi tặng 2 tấm ảnh đàn tre goong trong bộ ảnh điền dã cuả Gs tại Việt Nam để minh họa cho phần viết về đàn tre trong tiểu luận này.
Lê Tuấn Hùng
Advancing a Rules-based Maritime Order in the Indo-Pacific

Issues & Insights Vol. 21, SR 2 — Advancing a Rules-based Maritime Order in the Indo-Pacific
Overview
Authors of this volume participated in the Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Expert Working Group’s 2021 workshop that took place, virtually on March 23-24. The working group, composed of esteemed international security scholars and maritime experts from Japan, the United States, and other Indo-Pacific states, was formed to promote effective U.S.-Japan cooperation on maritime security issues in the region through rigorous research on various legal interpretations, national policies, and cooperative frameworks to understand what is driving regional maritime tensions and what can be done to reduce those tensions. The workshop’s goal is to help generate sound, pragmatic and actionable policy solutions for the United States, Japan, and the wider region, and to ensure that the rule of law and the spirit of cooperation prevail in maritime Indo- Pacific.
Table of Contents
- Introduction: Advancing a Rules-based Maritime Order in the Indo-Pacific | Jeffrey Ordaniel, Director, Maritime Programs, Pacific Forum
- Strengthening Maritime Crisis Prevention in Northeast Asia: A Focus on Subnational and Nonstate Actors | Shuxian Luo, Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Brookings Institution
- The Gaps in Japanese Maritime Security Law and the Senkaku Situation | Yurika Ishii, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Security Studies, National Defense Academy of Japan
- Maritime Security in the East China Sea: Japan’s Perspective | Atsuko Kanehara, Professor, Sophia University; President, Japanese Society of International Law
- Use of Force in International Law and the New China Coast Guard Law | Nguyen Thi Lan Huong, Research Fellow, East Sea Studies Institute, Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam
- Are We Ready for the Quad? Two Contradictory Goals | Kyoko Hatakeyama, Professor of International Relations, Graduate School of International Studies and Regional Development, University of Niigata Prefecture
- Modernizing U.S. Alliances for Maritime Security in the Indo-Pacific | Virginia Bacay Watson, Professor, Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies
- Maritime Governance Capacity Building: A U.S.-Japan Alliance Agenda for Rule of Law in the Indo-Pacific | John Bradford, Senior Fellow, Maritime Security Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University
The Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Expert Working Group’s 2021 workshop and this volume were funded by a grant from the U.S. Embassy Tokyo, and implemented in collaboration with the Yokosuka Council on Asia Pacific Studies (YCAPS).
The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their respective organizations and affiliations. For questions, please email maritime@pacforum.org.
Photo: The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), center left, and the Japanese helicopter destroyer JS Hyuga (DDH 181), center right, sail in formation with other ships from the U.S. Navy and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) as aircraft from the U.S. Air Force and Japan Air Self-Defense Force fly overhead in formation during Keen Sword 2019 in the Philippine Sea. Keen Sword 2019 is a joint, bilateral field-training exercise involving U.S. military and JMSDF personnel, designed to increase combat readiness and interoperability of the U.S.-Japan alliance. Source: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kaila V. Peters/Public domain.
USTR releases Annual Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Protection
To read the full Special 301 Report, click here >>
04/30/2021 USTR
WASHINGTON – The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) today released its annual Special 301 Report on the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.
“Intellectual property rights incentivize our creators, manufacturers, and innovators to invent new products and technologies,” said Ambassador Katherine Tai. “The laws, policies and practices that protect those rights must appropriately balance the interests of creators with those seeking to use their creations. Failing to adequately and effectively protect those rights in foreign markets hurts the U.S. economy, the dynamism of American innovators and the livelihoods of our workers.”
This annual report details USTR’s findings of more than 100 trading partners after significant research and enhanced engagement with stakeholders. Significant elements of the 2021 Special 301 Report include:
• The 2021 Special 301 review period has taken place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the largest global health crisis in more than a century. The top priority of the United States is saving lives and ending the pandemic in the United States and around the world. As affirmed in the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, the United States, while recognizing the role of intellectual property (IP) protection in the development of new medicines, respects a trading partner’s right to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.
• The United States has been closely monitoring China’s progress in implementing its commitments under the United States-China Economic and Trade Agreement (Phase One Agreement). In 2020, China published several draft IP-related legal and regulatory measures and finalized over a dozen measures. Notably, China amended the Patent Law, Copyright Law, and Criminal Law in the past year. However, these steps toward reform require effective implementation and fall short of the full range of fundamental changes needed to improve the IP landscape in China.
• Border, criminal, and online enforcement against counterfeiting remains a global concern. This past year, countries reported significant quantities of COVID-19 testing kits, personal protective equipment (PPE) such as N-95 and equivalent masks, and sanitizers, detergents, and disinfectants from China that were determined to be counterfeit. Widespread counterfeiting in China’s e-commerce markets, the largest in the world, has also been exacerbated by the migration of infringing sales from physical to online markets, which accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Concerns with the European Union’s aggressive promotion of its exclusionary geographical indications policies persist. The United States continues its intensive engagement in promoting and protecting access to foreign markets for U.S. exporters of products that are identified by common names or otherwise marketed under previously registered trademarks.
The report also highlights progress made by our trading partners to resolve and address IPR issues of concern to the United States:
• The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is removed from the Watch List this year due to the Ministry of Health and Prevention resolving concerns with IP protection of pharmaceutical products. The UAE also made progress on longstanding IP enforcement concerns, particularly through increased efforts by Dubai Customs, publication of IP enforcement procedures by multiple enforcement authorities, publication of annual IP enforcement statistics by Federal Customs, and efforts by the Ajman Department of Economic Development to significantly reduce the availability in counterfeit goods at the Ajman China Mall, a notorious market for the past several years.
• Algeria moves from the Priority Watch List to the Watch List due to steps the government has taken to engage and cooperate with stakeholders, improve enforcement efforts, and reduce IP-related market access barriers.
• Brazil’s law enforcement, with support from the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) International Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (ICHIP) Advisor for Latin America & the Caribbean and Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS), the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), as well as United Kingdom (UK) counterparts, launched “Operation 404.2,” which seized the domain names of multiple commercial websites engaged in the illegal reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works.
• In the most significant criminal case under Taiwan’s recently amended Trade Secrets Act, a court ruled that a Taiwan semiconductor company and three former employees were guilty of stealing trade secrets from a U.S. company to enable the development of semiconductor chips by a Chinese state-owned enterprise. The court imposed a $3.4 million fine on the Taiwan company and sentenced the former employees to 5-6 years in prison. The case involved substantial cooperation with U.S. investigators and prosecutors.
• Ukraine continued to take positive steps in 2020 toward a transparent, fair, and predictable system for the collective management of copyright royalties. In particular, pursuant to 2018 legislation that fundamentally reformed its collective management organization (CMO) system, Ukraine held open competitions and made progress toward completing accreditation of two additional CMOs in 2020. This follows the accreditation in 2019 of six other CMOs under the 2018 law. Some of the accredited CMOs have completed royalty negotiations and are paying royalties to right holders. For other CMOs selected under the 2018 law, accreditation and royalty negotiation progress continues.
BACKGROUND
The “Special 301” Report is an annual review of the global state of IP protection and enforcement. USTR conducts this review pursuant to Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
USTR reviewed more than one hundred (100) trading partners for this year’s Special 301 Report, and placed thirty-two (32) of them on the Priority Watch List or Watch List.
In this year’s Report, trading partners on the Priority Watch List present the most significant concerns this year regarding insufficient IP protection or enforcement or actions that otherwise limited market access for persons relying on intellectual property protection. Nine countries — Argentina, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, and Venezuela — are on the Priority Watch List. These countries will be the subject of particularly intense bilateral engagement during the coming year.
Twenty-three trading partners are on the Watch List, and merit bilateral attention to address underlying IP problems: Algeria, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mexico, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Romania, Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
USTR continued its enhanced approach to public engagement activities in this year’s Special 301 process. USTR requested written submissions from the public through a notice published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2020 (Federal Register notice). In addition, due to COVID-19, USTR fostered public participation via written submissions rather than an in-person hearing with the interagency Special 301 Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) sending written questions about issues relevant to the review to those that submitted written comments, including to representatives of foreign governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations. USTR posted the written questions and the written responses online at >www.regulations.gov<, docket number USTR-2020-0041.
The Federal Register notice drew submissions from 50 non-government stakeholders and 22 foreign governments. The submissions filed in response to the Federal Register notice are available to the public online at http://www.regulations.gov , docket number USTR-2020-0041.
Vietnamese cybersecurity expert tops world white-hat hacker ranking
Chia sẻ | FaceBookTwitter Email Copy LinkInterested029/07/2021 09:12 GMT+7
Nguyen Tuan Anh, security expert of Viettel Cyber Security, surpassed more than 25,000 “white hat hackers” in the world to top the June 2021 rankings of Bugcrowd, the world’s largest security vulnerability search platform.
![]() |
| Tuan Anh found 55 security holes on Oracle’s E-Business Suite product, a widely used software suite in the corporate environment, including a serious vulnerability could allow hackers to take control of the software remotely. |
Previously, Nguyen Tuan Anh also topped Bugcrowd’s ranking in April 2021. With nearly 200 discovered security holes, Tuan Anh has received the title “Most Valuable Professional” (MVP) of Bugcrowd for 4 times.
In 2020, he found 55 security holes on Oracle’s E-Business Suite product, a widely used software suite in the corporate environment, including a serious vulnerability could allow hackers to take control of the software remotely. E-Business Suite is a popular product used by large enterprises and organizations in the world (with 20% of enterprises in the Top 500 fortune globally using it).
Tiếp tục đọc “Vietnamese cybersecurity expert tops world white-hat hacker ranking”Vị trí Việt Nam trong hoạch định quốc phòng của Mỹ với khu vực
29/07/2021 08:37 GMT+7 vietnamnet
Bộ trưởng Quốc phòng Mỹ đang thực hiện chuyến công du Singapore, Việt Nam và Philippines. Đây là chuyến thăm đầu tiên đến Đông Nam Á của một quan chức hàng đầu trong chính quyền Biden.
Ba từ ngắn gọn về các lãnh đạo Việt Nam trong ấn tượng của Đại sứ Mỹ
Bộ trưởng Quốc phòng Mỹ nói về hành động của Trung Quốc ở Biển Đông
Cựu Bộ trưởng Quốc phòng Mỹ với ký ức Việt Nam theo suốt cuộc đời
Tại Singapore, ông Lloyd Austin đã phát biểu trong một sự kiện do Viện Nghiên cứu chiến lược quốc tế (IISS) tổ chức. Chuyến thăm của lãnh đạo Lầu Năm Góc thể hiện rằng, chính quyền Biden-Harris coi Đông Nam Á như một phần quan trọng của khu vực Ấn Độ Dương – Thái Bình Dương.
Chiều qua, chuyên cơ chở phái đoàn của Bộ trưởng Quốc phòng Mỹ đã hạ cánh xuống Hà Nội, bắt đầu chuyến thăm chính thức Việt Nam trong hai ngày.
Tiếp tục đọc “Vị trí Việt Nam trong hoạch định quốc phòng của Mỹ với khu vực”Nội các Chính phủ nhiệm kỳ 2021-2026
TTO – Nội các Chính phủ nhiệm kỳ 2021-2026 đã được Quốc hội khóa XV bầu và phê chuẩn gồm Thủ tướng, 4 phó thủ tướng và 22 bộ trưởng, trưởng ngành.

Phạm Minh Chính
Năm sinh: 1958
Quê quán: Hậu Lộc, Thanh Hóa
Chức vụ:
– Ủy viên Bộ Chính trị: Khóa XII, XIII
– Bí thư Trung ương Đảng: Khóa XII
– Ủy viên Trung ương Đảng: Khóa XI, XII, XIII
– Trưởng Ban Tổ chức Trung ương: Khóa XII
– Đại biểu Quốc hội: Khóa XIV
Trình độ lý luận chính trị: Cao cấp
Trình độ chuyên môn: Phó Giáo sư, Tiến sĩ Luật, Kỹ sư Xây dựng
TÓM TẮT QUÁ TRÌNH CÔNG TÁC
– 1984: Được phân công làm Nghiên cứu viên Khoa học Cục Nghiên cứu Khoa học, Kinh tế và Kỹ thuật, Bộ Nội vụ
– 1989: Bí thư thứ nhất tại Đại sứ quán CHXHCN Việt Nam tại Rumani
– 1996: Công tác tại Bộ Công an
– 2000: Bảo vệ Luận án Tiến sĩ Luật
– 2006: Được bổ nhiệm giữ chức Phó Tổng Cục trưởng Bộ Công an. Từng là chuyên viên cấp cao Văn phòng Chính phủ; giảng viên Đại học
– 4-2007: Được thăng cấp bậc hàm Thiếu tướng Công an nhân dân
– 12-2009: Phụ trách Tổng cục Hậu cần-Kỹ thuật, Bộ Công an
– 2-2010: Được bổ nhiệm giữ chức Tổng cục trưởng Tổng cục Hậu cần-Kỹ thuật, Bộ Công an
– 3-2010: Được phong học hàm Phó Giáo sư chuyên ngành Luật
– 7-2010: Được thăng cấp bậc hàm Trung tướng
– 8-2010: Thứ trưởng Bộ Công an
– 1-2011: Ủy viên Trung ương Đảng khóa XI
– 8-2011 – 4-2015: Bộ Chính trị điều động, phân công tham gia Ban Chấp hành, Ban Thường vụ và giữ chức Bí thư Tỉnh ủy Quảng Ninh khóa XIII, nhiệm kỳ 2010-2015
– 4-2015 – 1-2016: Bộ Chính trị điều động, phân công giữ chức vụ Phó Trưởng Ban Tổ chức Trung ương
– 1-2016: Tại Đại hội Đảng lần thứ XII, ông được bầu vào Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng. Tại Hội nghị lần thứ nhất Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng khóa XII, được bầu vào Bộ Chính trị
– 2-2016: Bộ Chính trị quyết định phân công tham gia Ban Bí thư Trung ương Đảng, giữ chức vụ Trưởng Ban Tổ chức Trung ương
– 30-1-2021: Tại Đại hội đại biểu toàn quốc lần thứ XIII của Đảng, ông được bầu là Ủy viên Trung ương Đảng khóa XIII, nhiệm kỳ 2021-2026
– 31-1-2021: Tại Hội nghị lần thứ nhất Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng khóa XIII, ông được bầu vào Bộ Chính trị khóa XIII, nhiệm kỳ 2021-2026.
– 5-4-2021: Được Quốc hội bầu làm Thủ tướng Chính phủ nước CHXHCN Việt Nam
Tiếp tục đọc “Nội các Chính phủ nhiệm kỳ 2021-2026”From the Caribbean to South China: A Tale of Two Seas

27 Jul 2021Military.com | By Joseph V. Micallef
Joseph V. Micallef is a best-selling military history and world affairs author, and keynote speaker. Follow him on Twitter @JosephVMicallef.
At first glance, the South and East China Seas, or China Seas, and the Caribbean Sea seem to have little in common.Advertisement
Situated on opposite ends of the Earth, they are what geographers describe as enclosed seas. To a naval strategist, that’s shorthand for an environment replete with numerous choke points from which maritime traffic can be interdicted.
Beyond this geostrategic similarity, however, these seas have another common element: the parallels and contrasts with how each region has handled the emergence of new military powers.
China in East Asia
For much of its history, China has been the predominant military power in East Asia. Historically, it was the largest country, had the largest population and the largest economy. All those factors are typically prerequisites for national power — a fact as true today as it was a millennium ago. The exceptions were periods when China was internally divided, beset by weak governments unable to assert their authority, or dominated by foreign powers.Advertisement
Tiếp tục đọc “From the Caribbean to South China: A Tale of Two Seas”As the Taliban surges across Afghanistan al-Qaeda is poised for a swift return
July 14, 2021 6.10am AEST
The imminent fall of Afghanistan is more than a national disaster. It is not just that the gains made in the past two decades, at the cost of tens of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, look certain to be reversed as the Taliban advances.
The Taliban’s victory is also al-Qaeda’s victory, and it has global implications.
Even before the US military completes the final steps of its troop withdrawal, the Taliban is surging. It is now reported to control 212 districts — more than half of Afghanistan’s 407 districts. This is triple the territory it controlled on May 1. The Taliban has seized 51 districts since the start of July alone.
Tiếp tục đọc “As the Taliban surges across Afghanistan al-Qaeda is poised for a swift return”
