Gaza boycotts batter American fast-food chains in Malaysia, Indonesia

business-standard.com

Starbucks, KFC, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s suffer sales slumps as Gaza war boycotts continue across Asia, boosting local and Palestinian brands

Starbucks, KFC, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s suffer sales slumps amid Gaza war boycotts

Gaza boycotts batter fast-food chains Starbucks, KFC, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s and other US brands in Malaysia and Indonesia | Photo: PexelsVasudha Mukherjee New Delhi

In Malaysia and Indonesia, some of the biggest names in fast food — Starbucks, KFC, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s — are still struggling to recover from the financial hit caused by boycotts sparked by the war in Gaza, according to a report by Nikkei Asia.

Steep sales drops for US fast food chains in Malaysia

In Malaysia, Starbucks operator Berjaya Food reported an 18 per cent year-on-year revenue drop in early 2024, with net losses widening to 37.2 million ringgit (US $9 million). Its share price has fallen another 15 per cent this year. The chain has leaned on heavy localisation efforts — drinks curated by Malaysian baristas, locally designed merchandise, and menu items by a popular local chef — but store managers expect the total number of outlets to shrink from 350 to under 300 by 2026.

QSR Brands, which runs KFC and Pizza Hut, swung from a pre-tax profit of 49.6 million ringgit in 2023 to a 66.2 million ringgit loss in 2024. It has cut prices, pizzas as low as 5 ringgit, stressed its halal credentials, and hired more local staff to appeal to customers.

Tiếp tục đọc “Gaza boycotts batter American fast-food chains in Malaysia, Indonesia”

Australia’s Strategic Priorities and Challenges with Southeast Asia

lowyinstitute.org By Susannah Patton 6 November 2025

On this page

Listen to this journal article

Introduction

Going into the 2022 election, improving relations with Southeast Asia was at the top of the foreign policy to-do list for the Australian Labor Party, led by now prime minister Anthony Albanese. While the outgoing Liberal-National coalition government had notched up some achievements in its engagement with the region, there was also a sense of drift. The Pacific Step Up policy had focused on boosting ties with one of Australia’s two near regions, but Southeast Asia had not received the same level of diplomatic focus. Among the Labor Party’s pledges were appointing a special envoy for Southeast Asia, providing A$470 million in new aid to the region, and creating an office for Southeast Asia within the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. [1] For the most part, the Albanese government has followed through on its commitment to strengthen ties with Southeast Asia through more active diplomatic outreach, an economic strategy to boost two-way trade and investment, and a more nuanced approach to managing sensitive issues in Australia’s relations with the region, especially China-related issues and Middle East policy.

During the new term of government beginning in 2025, it is likely that the Albanese government will maintain Southeast Asia, along with the Pacific Islands, as a region of high priority. Albanese’s July 2025 John Curtin Oration articulated what he called Labor’s “constructive and creative role” and gave high billing to efforts to intensify economic engagement with Southeast Asia and deepen security cooperation with Indonesia. [2] While other global relationships may fluctuate according to events, the central importance of Southeast Asia within this distinctively Labor worldview suggests that engagement with this region, especially Indonesia, will remain high on Australia’s agenda for the next three years.

This essay analyzes the achievements of the Albanese government in its relations with Southeast Asia. It also assesses the continued challenges Australia faces both in deepening economic relations with the region and in continuing to balance regional ties with the U.S. alliance, especially given a less predictable and more demanding administration in Washington.

Tiếp tục đọc “Australia’s Strategic Priorities and Challenges with Southeast Asia”

Vietnam and South Korea are both influenced by China. Why has South Korea become a developed country while Vietnam is still a poor country?

QUORA

Profile photo for Lucia Millar

Lucia Millar · 

Quran user at Quora (company) (2020–present)Updated 4y

Question: Vietnam and South Korea are both influenced by China. Why has South Korea become a developed country while Vietnam is still a poor country?

Answer: It is true that Vietnam and South Korea or Korea had culturally influenced by China. However, South Korea become developed has nothing to do with China but the US. Vietnam is another story that the US did not want Vietnam to become independent and reunited from 1950–1975. The conflicting interests between both countries lasted from 1950–1995 with the US-Vietnamese normalization of their relationship. After that, Vietnam has started to grow fast and is no longer one of the poorest countries in Asia.

Tiếp tục đọc “Vietnam and South Korea are both influenced by China. Why has South Korea become a developed country while Vietnam is still a poor country?”