The current war in Ukraine, which has shown the impotence of the UN Security Council when one of its permanent members goes to war in violation of the UN Charter, has brought renewed energy to the debate over reforming the Council. Security Council reform has been an ongoing topic of discussion in the UN General Assembly since the early post-Cold War period, with reform pressures tending to intensify in response to an international crisis that exposes the structural weaknesses of the Security Council.
The new momentum for changing the status quo took off on 27 February, when the Security Council referred the situation in Ukraine to the General Assembly following its own failure to adopt a draft resolution deploring Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This was the Security Council’s first use of a “Uniting for Peace” resolution in 40 years. Two months later, through an initiative led by Liechtenstein, the General Assembly decided by consensus (A/RES/76/262, adopted on 26 April) that it would meet whenever a veto is cast in the Security Council. It has now convened twice in accordance with this new procedure: following vetoes by China and Russia on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in May, and after a Russian veto on Syria in July.
Security Council Reform: What Does It Mean, What Would It Require?
Tiếp tục đọc “In Hindsight: The Long and Winding Road to UN Security Council Reform “
CVD 
![https://www.thethirdpole.net/content/uploads/2022/12/Dredged-sand-transported-in-Mekong-Delta_Alamy_HFPKCG-scaled.jpg"](https://www.thethirdpole.net/content/uploads/2022/12/Dredged-sand-transported-in-Mekong-Delta_Alamy_HFPKCG-scaled.jpg"){kind=link}