Shipping data: UNCTAD releases new seaborne trade statistics

UNCTAD.org 23 April 2025

Maritime transport moves over 80% of goods traded worldwide. Country-level seaborne trade data is vital for shaping better transport, trade and investment policies.

An aerial view of a container vessel leaving port
Default image copyright and description© Shutterstock/Studio conept

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) released on 15 April new seaborne trade dataFor the first time, the dataset includes country-level statistics.

Maritime transport is the backbone of global trade, moving over 80% of goods traded worldwide by volume. It connects global value chains, carrying raw materials and semi-processed goods to production hubs and delivering finished products to consumers. These flows are vital for industrialization, economic growth and job creation.

Seaborne trade has evolved over the decades, shaped by containerization, the rise of developing economies and shifting production and consumption patterns. Today, digitalization, geopolitics and the push for sustainability and climate resilience are redefining the sector.

A clearer picture of who ships what – and how much

Reliable, up-to-date country-level data is key to understanding trade flows and guiding better transport and trade policies and investment decisions.

Built from official trade data reported by governments to UN Comtradethe new dataset offers a more accurate and comparable view of global maritime cargo movements, helping countries to:

  • Monitor trade performance and competitiveness.
  • Assess integration into global supply chains and trade networks.
  • Inform port and transport infrastructure investment decisions.
  • Track progress on Sustainable Development Goal 9.1.2 to develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure – for which maritime freight and port cargo volumes are indicators.

Data highlights developing countries’ rising share of maritime trade

Historically, developing countries served mainly as loading hubs – major exporters of raw materials but marginal importers of manufactured goods. But this has evolved since the 1970s, driven by structural changes such as the oil crises, trade liberalization, increased private sector participation in port operations, the rise of container shipping and reforms to liner shipping alliances.

The shift accelerated in the early 2000s as developing countries increased trade among themselves – including in raw materials, oil and manufactured goods. Their share of global maritime freight rose from 38% in 2000 to 54% in 2023. The surge was led by Asia, with China driving much of the growth.

Read full article here https://unctad.org/news/shipping-data-unctad-releases-new-seaborne-trade-statistics

UNCTAD16: Countries to meet in Viet Nam to propel development in a multipolar world

UNCTAD

17 January 2025

UN Trade and Development’s 16th quadrennial conference is set for October with a focus on driving economic transformation for a more sustainable future.

Default image copyright and description© UNCTAD Photo | The Trade and Development Board meets for its 33rd special session in Geneva on 17 January.

The 16th session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD16) will take place Viet Nam in October 2025 under the theme “Shaping the future: Driving economic transformation for equitable, inclusive and sustainable development”.

Tiếp tục đọc “UNCTAD16: Countries to meet in Viet Nam to propel development in a multipolar world”

ConocoPhillips & Perenco vs. Vietnam: Making profits but refusing to pay taxes

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
linkedin sharing button
Photo: CEO, TNI, FOEI: CC BY 2.0

ISDS Platform

  • Amount demanded: Data not available
  • Outcome: pending
  • Treaty invoked: United Kingdom – Vietnam BIT (2002)
  • Sector: energy
  • Issue: tax avoidance

by CEO, FOE & TNI

Effectively and fairly collecting taxes is essential for all states, and especially for developing countries that wish to sustainably develop. Tax collection also offers a means to guarantee quality public services for all and to collectively face the challenges of climate change. However, in Vietnam and in other countries, big corporations challenge governments that try to impose taxes on their massive profits. Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) is one of their main avenues to try to avoid paying taxes and to receive millions in compensation instead.

Tiếp tục đọc “ConocoPhillips & Perenco vs. Vietnam: Making profits but refusing to pay taxes”

EU và những thách thức mang tên “ASEAN”

ANTG – Thứ Ba, 09/07/2024, 08:18

Mặc dù chưa ký hiệp định thương mại tự do (FTA) với ASEAN, nhưng EU vẫn duy trì sự hiện diện kinh tế mạnh mẽ trong khu vực. EU hiện là đối tác thương mại lớn thứ ba của ASEAN, chỉ sau Trung Quốc và Mỹ.

Thương mại ASEAN – EU năm 2022 đạt 295,2 tỷ USD – tăng 9,6% so với năm 2021. Ngoài ra, EU là nguồn FDI lớn thứ ba của ASEAN, với 24 tỷ USD năm 2022. Theo dữ liệu từ Báo cáo đầu tư ASEAN cùng kỳ, các quốc gia thành viên EU như Pháp, Đức và Hà Lan nằm trong số các nguồn FDI hàng đầu của ASEAN.

Tiếp tục đọc “EU và những thách thức mang tên “ASEAN””

Đầu tư công: Thúc cho tiền ‘chạy’

tuoitre.vn

Trong lúc kinh tế “khó đều trời” thì hàng trăm nghìn tỉ đồng vốn đầu tư công tiêu xài nhỏ giọt, tiền nằm chờ trong ngân hàng cả triệu tỉ đồng.

Đồ họa: TẤN ĐẠT
Đồ họa: TẤN ĐẠT

Vấn đề đặt ra lúc này là phải thúc cho đồng tiền chạy vào nền kinh tế, tạo ra giá trị mới.

Đầu tư công là động lực tăng trưởng quan trọng của nền kinh tế trong bối cảnh tư nhân gặp khó hiện nay, nhưng tám tháng qua giải ngân đầu tư công cả nước mới đạt khoảng 299.450 tỉ đồng, tương đương 42,35% kế hoạch cả năm.

Các chuyên gia dự báo nếu hoàn thành mục tiêu giải ngân 95% vốn đầu tư công trong năm nay thì GDP năm 2023 sẽ tăng thêm khoảng 1,3%.

Thúc giải ngân các dự án giao thông lớn

Tại TP.HCM, trong số 68.786 tỉ đồng vốn đầu tư công năm 2023, tính đến ngày 17-8 mới giải ngân được 19.133 tỉ đồng, tương đương 27% kế hoạch vốn được giao. Trong báo cáo tình hình giải ngân năm 2023 vừa gửi tới Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư, UBND TP cho biết giải ngân vốn ngân sách trung ương trong tám tháng đạt 11.200 tỉ đồng và từ ngân sách địa phương đạt khoảng 7.933 tỉ đồng.

Như vậy, tỉ lệ giải ngân của TP.HCM trong tám tháng thấp hơn khá nhiều so với tỉ lệ giải ngân 42,35% của cả nước.

Tiếp tục đọc “Đầu tư công: Thúc cho tiền ‘chạy’”

EU CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DIRECTIVE (CSRD): THE WHY, HOW & IMPACT ON VIETNAM

sustainablevietnam.com September 5, 2023

EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD):  The Why, How & Impact on Vietnam

By Christina Ameln, Sustainability Strategist and Advisor –

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is the most ambitious reporting directive putting climate, nature and social impacts (non-financial) equal to financial reporting. While it might seem as a regulation aimed exclusively at companies in the EU, the impact will be wide-reaching. Non-EU companies will also feel the impact, including in Vietnam. The potential significance of this regulation on Vietnamese companies, investments and especially Vietnam’s supply chain cannot be ignored.

For us to understand the impact, let’s review the:

  • EU Green Deal;
  • Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD);
  • European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS);
  • Impact on Vietnam with a focus on company, investors and value chain with suppliers as the focus; and
  • How this is not just about compliance but how organizations will put sustainability strategically front and center.

EU Ambitions: Green Deal

Let’s take a step back to understand where this all originates. In 2020, the European Commission launched its ambitious European Green Deal. The goal is to become the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. And among other sustainability related goals, the Green Deal aims to reduce Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.

But the EU cannot do it alone.

Market participants, such as corporates to financial market players, play an important role in achieving and contributing to these targets in shifting away from an economy that encourages carbon-intensive business to one that drives transformation to a zero-carbon society. There is also the question of funding: According to the EU Commission, Europe will need an estimated EUR 350 billion in additional investment per year over this decade to meet its 2030 emissions-reduction target in energy systems alone, alongside the EUR 130 billion it will need for other environmental goals.

Tiếp tục đọc “EU CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DIRECTIVE (CSRD): THE WHY, HOW & IMPACT ON VIETNAM”

Sản phẩm sản xuất trên đất chặt phá rừng sẽ không được phép vào thị trường châu Âu

vneconomy.vn

Không có bất cứ hàng hóa và sản phẩm nào được phép đưa vào thị trường châu Âu nếu chúng được sản xuất trên đất bị chặt phá rừng hay suy thoái rừng…

Sản phẩm sản xuất trên đất chặt phá rừng sẽ không được phép vào thị trường châu Âu. Ảnh: UNDP
Sản phẩm sản xuất trên đất chặt phá rừng sẽ không được phép vào thị trường châu Âu. Ảnh: UNDP

Ngày 24/2, Chương trình Phát triển LHQ (UNDP), Liên minh châu Âu, và Tổng cục Lâm nghiệp trực thuộc Bộ Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn phối hợp tổ chức hội thảo kỹ thuật về sản xuất và thương mại nông sản không gây mất rừng.

Hội thảo là cơ hội để đại biểu lắng nghe ý kiến đa dạng từ các diễn giả với hiểu biết và kinh nghiệm quý giá liên quan tới sản xuất và thương mại nông sản không gây mất rừng.

Theo ông Patrick Haverman, Phó Trưởng Đại diện Chương trình Phát triển Liên hợp quốc (UNDP) tại Việt Nam, việc phá rừng và suy thoái rừng đang là những nguyên nhân quan trọng gây ra biến đổi khí hậu và mất mát đa dạng sinh học trên toàn cầu.

Các hàng hóa dự kiến sẽ chịu tác động bởi Quy định này gồm: Dầu cọ, đậu nành, gỗ, gia súc, ca cao, cà phê, cao su và một số sản phẩm có nguồn gốc từ đó (ví dụ: sôcôla, đồ nội thất, lốp xe, sản phẩm in).

Tiếp tục đọc “Sản phẩm sản xuất trên đất chặt phá rừng sẽ không được phép vào thị trường châu Âu”

Court says renewable firms can seize Spain’s property after subsidy cuts

Climate Change News | 4 August 2023

A Spanish solar plant in 2022 (REUTERS/Guillermo Martínez)

London’s High Court has ruled that two investors in Spanish solar energy plants are entitled to seize a Spanish property in London to enforce a judgment in a long-running dispute over renewable energy incentives.

The court’s interim charging order – meaning it is not yet final and can be objected to by the debtor – was issued on Wednesday but made public on Friday.

->

Mining is growing rapidly – so are investor-state disputes

mining.com

As the mining industry grows, so do disputes, litigation

Stock image.

recent study by Charles River Associates (CRA) outlines some worrying trends for global mining as the industry continues to expand and push into new markets.   

The Toronto-based consultants, specialising in economic litigation found disputes between governments and investors involving mineral assets are growing rapidly – with 60% of all arbitrations over the last fifty years filed in the last decade. 

Tiếp tục đọc “Mining is growing rapidly – so are investor-state disputes”

Energy transition calls for faster investment treaty reforms

UNCTAD.org 30 August 2023

UNCTAD presents a new toolbox to make international investment agreements actively support the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources.

News

© Shutterstock/Sander van der Werf | Wind turbines and a coal power plant in Eemshaven port in the Netherlands.

Sweltering heatwaves each year underline the need for a faster energy transition and speedier reform of international investment agreements (IIAs) to support the shift away from fossil fuels.

To reach net zero emissions by 2050, annual clean energy investment worldwide needs to more than triple to $4 trillion by 2030.

But many investment treaties, especially older ones, can hinder the transition. As countries try to cut ties with fossil fuels, oil and gas firms might use these treaties to challenge policy changes. An example is a coal phase-out claim against the Netherlands.

Tiếp tục đọc “Energy transition calls for faster investment treaty reforms”

RCEP- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership  – a boon or a bust for sustainable trade?

gtreview.com ASIA / 18-04-23 / BY ELEANOR WRAGG

As the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) machine whirrs into life and trade flows within the bloc increase, could its paucity of explicit ESG provisions lead to a lowering of sustainability ambitions for trade? Eleanor Wragg reports.

Just over a year has passed since RCEP, the world’s largest trade agreement, came into force. Covering a third of the world’s population and linking together least developed countries (LDCs) such as Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar to wealthier nations like Australia, China, South Korea and Japan, the deal promises to inject new impetus into regional integration and cement the position of ‘Factory Asia’ at the centre of the world’s supply chains.

The well-documented linkages between trade liberalisation and increased productivity, wages and employment could help some of RCEP’s poorest countries inch closer to achieving United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 – no poverty, and 8 – decent work and economic growth.

However, unlike most recent preferential trade pacts, RCEP does not contain provisions on topics such as the environment or labour rights, raising questions about the extent to which it balances economic interest with social and environmental protections.

A shot in the arm for Asian trade

Thrashed out over eight long years of painstaking negotiations between the 10 Asean member states, Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea as well as India – which walked away from talks before they were finalised – RCEP streamlines the tangled web of bilateral trade agreements among its signatories into a bumper megadeal that spans 510 pages of agreement text and thousands upon thousands of pages of associated schedules.

Tiếp tục đọc “RCEP- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership  – a boon or a bust for sustainable trade?”

Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Obstructing a Just Energy Transition

FAQ: What is Investor-State Dispute Settlement and What Does it Mean for Climate Action?

Boston University Global Development Policy Center

Photo by Zachary Theodore via Unsplash.

A controversial legal process known as investor-state dispute settlements (ISDS) is making it difficult for governments to mobilize finance for ambitious climate action.

When assets are protected by international investment treaties, like the Energy Charter Treaty, legal claims can be brought against countries by investors who feel they are negatively impacted by government policies. For example, Italy was recently ordered to pay UK-based oil/gas company Rockhopper more than €190 million for the Italian government’s refusal to grant an offshore oil concession. A May 2022 study in Science found potential ISDS claims globally could total as much as $340 billion.

Tiếp tục đọc “Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Obstructing a Just Energy Transition”

Energy charter treaty makes climate action nearly illegal in 52 countries – so how can we leave it?

theconversation.com

Published: July 6, 2022 6.28pm BST

Five young people whose resolve was hardened by floods and wildfires recently took their governments to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Their claim concerns each country’s membership of an obscure treaty they argue makes climate action impossible by protecting fossil fuel investors.

The energy charter treaty has 52 signatory countries which are mostly EU states but include the UK and Japan. The claimants are suing 12 of them including France, Germany and the UK – all countries in which energy companies are using the treaty to sue governments over policies that interfere with fossil fuel extraction. For example, the German company RWE is suing the Netherlands for €1.4 billion (£1.2 billion) because it plans to phase out coal.

The claimants aim to force their countries to exit the treaty and are supported by the Global Legal Action Network, a campaign group with an ongoing case against 33 European countries they accuse of delaying action on climate change. The prospects for the current application going to a hearing at the ECHR look good. But how simple is it to prise countries from the influence of this treaty?

Tiếp tục đọc “Energy charter treaty makes climate action nearly illegal in 52 countries – so how can we leave it?”

Japan’s quiet leadership as it hosts the G7 summit in Hiroshima

brookings.edu

Mireya Solís, director of the Center for East Asian Policy Studies at Brookings, explains the significance of Japan hosting the G7 summit in Hiroshima, and how Tokyo centers its foreign policy on promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific region. “This is Japan’s grand strategy,” Solís says, “this is really the roadmap that Japan has charted to achieve its security and prosperity.”

Mireya Solís, director of the Center for East Asian Policy Studies at Brookings, explains the significance of Japan hosting the G7 summit in Hiroshima, and how Tokyo centers its foreign policy on promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific region. “This is Japan’s grand strategy,” Solís says, “this is really the roadmap that Japan has charted to achieve its security and prosperity.”

TRANSCRIPT

[music]

DOLLAR: Hi, I’m David Dollar, host of the Brookings Trade podcast Dollar and Sense. Today, my guest is Mireya Solís, director of the Center for East Asian Policy Studies here at Brookings. Mireya is a leading expert on Japan’s trade and economic diplomacy, and she has a book coming out this summer on Japan’s quiet leadership. And one aspect of this quiet leadership, or maybe not so quiet right now, is Japan will be hosting the G7 summit in Hiroshima starting on May 19. That’s the main thing we’re going to talk about.

Because of the Memorial Day holiday in the United States, we’re going to push back production one week. So, the next episode will come out on June 5th.

So, welcome to the show, Mireya.

SOLÍS: Thank you so much, David. It’s a pleasure to be here.

Tiếp tục đọc “Japan’s quiet leadership as it hosts the G7 summit in Hiroshima”