Why China is finally starting to acknowledge its overcapacity problem

channelnewsasia.com

Where Beijing once celebrated its manufacturing and export prowess, it now openly discusses the need to curb “involution”. This is a dramatic departure from its previous stance, says Enodo Economics’ Diana Choyleva.

Commentary: Why China is finally starting to acknowledge its overcapacity problem
People browse in electric car showrooms located on the 5th floor in a popular shopping mall in Beijing on Jul 21, 2025. (Photo: CNA/Hu Chushi)

LONDON: For years, Beijing dismissed Western concerns about Chinese overcapacity as protectionist rhetoric. When the United States and European Union complained about cheap Chinese exports flooding global markets, China’s response was predictable: These were simply competitive advantages in a free market economy.

That narrative has now fundamentally shifted. In a remarkable policy U-turn, China has not only started acknowledging the overcapacity problem but is treating it as a national priority that requires urgent intervention.

While there have been signs of this narrative change for a while, the clearest signal of this messaging transformation came through recently on China’s own policy channels.

In July, the Communist Party’s leading journal Qiushi warned that “disorderly competition has destroyed entire industry ecology”. This wasn’t diplomatic language about market dynamics – it was an admission that destructive competition had reached crisis proportions.

Tiếp tục đọc “Why China is finally starting to acknowledge its overcapacity problem”

Kyla Scanlon: Young men are really turning right.

FP

Generation Z is coming of age at a particularly difficult time. Zoomers, as they’re known, are aged between 13 and 28 and have already lived through a global financial crisis, a historic pandemic, and several wars. Now, many of them confront an entry-level job market muddled by advances in AI.

Tiếp tục đọc “Kyla Scanlon: Young men are really turning right.”

Ông Trump ký sắc lệnh áp thuế đối ứng với hàng chục nền kinh tế

VNExpress

Ngày 2/4, Tổng thống Mỹ Donald Trump công bố mức thuế nhập khẩu với hàng chục nền kinh tế, trong đó Việt Nam chịu mức 46%.

Tại sự kiện, Tổng thống Mỹ cũng mang theo tấm bảng ghi mức thuế áp dụng với từng nền kinh tế. Trong đó, Anh, Brazil, Singapore sẽ chịu 10% thuế. Liên minh châu Âu, Malaysia, Nhật Bản, Hàn Quốc, Ấn Độ chịu 20-26%. Trung Quốc và Việt Nam nằm trong nhóm các nước bị áp mức thuế cao nhất, lần lượt là 34% và 46%.

Khoảng nửa giờ sau khi cầm chiếc bảng công bố mức thuế đối ứng với từng đối tác thương mại, Tổng thống Trump ký sắc lệnh áp thuế.

Tiếp tục đọc “Ông Trump ký sắc lệnh áp thuế đối ứng với hàng chục nền kinh tế”

Mother Jones Daily: Tomorrow, the “liberating” finally begins

March 31, 2025
Are you ready to be liberated?Donald Trump’s ingenious plan to escalate his global trade war is set to start tomorrow, which the president vows will lay the groundwork for a golden era for the US economy. What the hell does that mean?

In the simplest terms, “Liberation Day” will impose significant tariff increases on all imports, while forcing companies to relocate supply chains to the US. That’s because, in Trump’s mind, foreign countries have “really abused us” for decades.

That, of course, is false; even the Wall Street Journal labeled Trump’s punitive tariffs as “the dumbest trade war in history.” Tiếp tục đọc “Mother Jones Daily: Tomorrow, the “liberating” finally begins”
March 31, 2025
Are you ready to be liberated?Donald Trump’s ingenious plan to escalate his global trade war is set to start tomorrow, which the president vows will lay the groundwork for a golden era for the US economy. What the hell does that mean?

In the simplest terms, “Liberation Day” will impose significant tariff increases on all imports, while forcing companies to relocate supply chains to the US. That’s because, in Trump’s mind, foreign countries have “really abused us” for decades.

That, of course, is false; even the Wall Street Journal labeled Trump’s punitive tariffs as “the dumbest trade war in history.” Tiếp tục đọc “Mother Jones Daily: Tomorrow, the “liberating” finally begins”

Trump’s fate and an obscure section of the Constitution collide at Supreme Court

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen at sunset in Washington, on Jan. 24, 2019. The Supreme Court will be taking its first look in the 156-year history of the 14th Amendment at a provision, Section 3, that's meant to keep former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from ever regaining power. The stakes couldn't be higher in arguments taking place on Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
FILE – The Supreme Court is seen at sunset in Washington, on Jan. 24, 2019. The Supreme Court will be taking its first look in the 156-year history of the 14th Amendment at a provision, Section 3, that’s meant to keep former officeholders who “engaged in insurrection” from ever regaining power. The stakes couldn’t be higher in arguments taking place on Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

BY MARK SHERMAN AND NICHOLAS RICCARDIUpdated 12:04 PM GMT+7, February 6, 2024Share

WASHINGTON (AP) — From civil rights to privacy, the 14th Amendment has been a foundation for forging the norms of American law and democracy. But one of its provisions, adopted after the Civil War in 1868, has gotten almost no attention until now: That’s Section 3, the part that’s meant to keep former officeholders who “engaged in insurrection” from ever regaining power.

Tiếp tục đọc “Trump’s fate and an obscure section of the Constitution collide at Supreme Court”

The court can only rescue Trump from the Colorado ruling by shredding originalism and textualism. Will it?


Sidney Blumenthal

Sidney Blumenthal

Tue 26 Dec 2023 11.00 GMT The Guardian

Donald Trump’s packing of the supreme court, to which he appointed three members, to create a reliable conservative majority, has been hailed by the right as his greatest achievement. The Wall Street Journal editorial page has stated that the most important prospect of a second Trump term would be his appointment of federal judges in their mold. But Trump’s candidacy for that second term now poses an existential threat to the legitimacy of the court’s conservative majority.

Tiếp tục đọc “The court can only rescue Trump from the Colorado ruling by shredding originalism and textualism. Will it?”